Civil War Unit

Most textbooks no longer tell the whole story of the Civil war. This is an incomplete list of the things I want to explore when we study the unit next year. I'll be working on it over the summer, so feel free to make suggestions.


  • The complex issues that lead to the Civil War. Slavery was NOT the main reason for the war. In fact a lot of people in the North didn't care one way or another about slavery. And a lot of Southerners didn't own slaves. Don't get me wrong slavery was an issue, but it wasn't the only issue or the main reason for the war.

From American Civil War.Com

There were many reasons for a Civil War to happen in America, and political issues and disagreements began soon after the American Revolution ended in 1782. Between the years 1800 and 1860, arguments between the North and South grew more intense. One of the main quarrels was about taxes paid on goods brought into this country from foreign countries. This tax was called a tariff. Southerners felt these tariffs were unfair and aimed toward them because they imported a wider variety of goods than most Northern people. Taxes were also placed on many Southern goods that were shipped to foreign countries, an expense that was not always applied to Northern goods of equal value. An awkward economic structure allowed states and private transportation companies to do this, which also affected Southern banks that found themselves paying higher interest rates on loans made with banks in the North. The situation grew worse after several "panics", including one in 1857 that affected more Northern banks than Southern. Southern financiers found themselves burdened with high payments just to save Northern banks that had suffered financial losses through poor investment.


In the years before the

Civil War the political power in the Federal government, centered in Washington, D.C., was changing. Northern and mid-western states were becoming more and more powerful as the populations increased. Southern states lost political power because the population did not increase as rapidly. As one portion of the nation grew larger than another, people began to talk of the nation as sections. This was called sectionalism. Just as the original thirteen colonies fought for their independence almost 100 years earlier, the Southern states felt a growing need for freedom from the central Federal authority in Washington. Southerners believed that state laws carried more weight than Federal laws, and they should abide by the state regulations first. This issue was called State's Rights and became a very warm topic in congress.


If you are looking for a good work of fiction Bernard Cornwell's Starbuck Chronicles actually does a good job exploring the complex reasons for the war.

  • The different people that lived in the South. Too often the South is portrayed as a land of wealthy white plantation owners and their black slaves, with no other groups represented. There were free blacks some of whom owned slaves.

Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city.

The majority of slaveholders, white and black, owned only one to five slaves. More often than not, and contrary to a century and a half of bullwhips-on-tortured-backs propaganda, black and white masters worked and ate alongside their charges; be it in house, field or workshop. The few individuals who owned 50 or more slaves were confined to the top one percent, and have been defined as slave magnates.

Antoine Dubuclet, a black New Orleans plantation owner who held more than 100 slaves, became Louisiana state treasurer during Reconstruction, a post he held from 1868 to 1877 (10). (I wonder why they never mention him during Black History Month?)

You can read more here.

Besides plantation owners there were of course small farmers who didn't own any slaves, shop keepers, lawyers, doctors etc.

  • The mistreatment of African-Americans who fled North. Specifically the Civil War Draft Riots

(In New York)

All male citizens between twenty and thirty-five and all unmarried men between thirty-five and forty-five years of age were subject to military duty. The federal government entered all eligible men into a lottery. Those who could afford to hire a substitute or pay the government three hundred dollars might avoid enlistment. Blacks, who were not considered citizens, were exempt from the draft.

On Monday, July 13, 1863, between 6 and 7 A.M., the five days of mayhem and bloodshed that would be known as the Civil War Draft Riots began.
The rioters' targets initially included only military and governmental buildings, symbols of the unfairness of the draft. Mobs attacked only those individuals who interfered with their actions. But by afternoon of the first day, some of the rioters had turned to attacks on black people, and on things symbolic of black political, economic, and social power. Rioters attacked a black fruit vendor and a nine-year-old boy at the corner of Broadway and Chambers Street before moving to the Colored Orphan Asylum on Fifth Avenue between Forty-Third and Forty-Fourth Streets.

Throughout the week of riots, mobs harassed and sometimes killed blacks and their supporters and destroyed their property. Rioters burned the home of Abby Hopper Gibbons, prison reformer and daughter of abolitionist Isaac Hopper. They also attacked white "amalgamationists," such as Ann Derrickson and Ann Martin, two women who were married to black men; and Mary Burke, a white prostitute who catered to black men.

Black men and black women were attacked, but the rioters singled out the men for special violence. On the waterfront, they hanged William Jones and then burned his body. White dock workers also beat and nearly drowned Charles Jackson, and they beat Jeremiah Robinson to death and threw his body in the river. Rioters also made a sport of mutilating the black men's bodies, sometimes sexually. A group of white men and boys mortally attacked black sailor William Williams—jumping on his chest, plunging a knife into him, smashing his body with stones—while a crowd of men, women, and children watched.

With these actions white workers enacted their desires to eradicate the working-class black male presence from the city. The Longshoreman's Association, a white labor union, patrolled the piers during the riots, insisting that "the colored people must and shall be driven to other parts of industry." But "other parts of industry," such as cartmen and hack drivers, not to mention skilled artisans, also sought to exclude black workers. The riots gave all these workers license to physically remove blacks not only from worksites, but also from neighborhoods and leisure spaces. The rioters' actions also indicate the degree to which the sensational journalists and reformers of the 1840s and 1850s had achieved their goals of convincing whites, and particularly the Irish, that interracial socializing and marriage were evil and degrading practices. The riots unequivocally divided white workers from blacks.

Quotes from an excerpt of In the Shadow of Slavery.

  • Colored troops both Northern and Southern. (yes blacks did fight for the Confederacy)

Majors James W. Pegram and Thomas P. Turner put together a "Negro Brigade" of Confederate States Colored Troops. The Richmond Daily Examiner noted of the unit "the knowledge of the military art they already exhibit was something remarkable. They moved with evident pride and satisfaction to themselves."

When Lee surrendered his army at Appomattox, thirty-six African-Americans were listed on the Confederate paroles. Most were either servants, free blacks, musicians, cooks, teamsters or blacksmiths.

Read more here.

We are going to give the Civil War recipes a try, even though they sound very unappetizing.

5 comments:

Henry Cate said...

"Slavery was NOT the main reason for the war."

In High School I was taught that the Civil War was necessary to preserve the union. But there was always a message that one of the great things that happened the righteous North got rid of slavery. It was often said in a noble sounding way.

I heard recently that the United States was the only nation in the both North and South America which took a war to abolish slavery.

It is clear the North was abusing the South economically. In recent years I've come to the conclusion that Lincoln made a mistake. He should have just let the South go.

It will be interesting to see what you find in your studies and your conclusions.

Sprittibee said...

I wonder what would have happened if Sam Houston had not pulled out of the race and had won the presidency instead of Lincoln. What would a Southern president have done in the face of a split? We shall never know. I am glad that there is no slavery, but I weep for the loss of state rights for each individual state in our nation. I grieve for those who's property and homes were destroyed. I feel sad for the loss of life on both sides of the war. I have a movie to suggest for you (aside from Gods and Generals and Cold Mountain - both of which you probably have already seen and are excellent). The movie we watched not long ago (edited during the love-scenes between the main characters!) was True Women. Excellent movie about women in the west and how they dealt with "reconstruction", Indian-White relations, harsh conditions, disease, etc. It was very touching. Just be sure to edit out the love scenes if you have younger kids who don't know much about the birds and bees. It is a tad over-the-top for kids.

Alastriona, The Cats and Dogs said...

Sprittibee, thank you for the movie suggestions. We actually haven't seen any of the movies you mentioned, so I am going to see IF I can borrow them from my library. They have a pretty wide selection of DVD's these days.

Hi Henry, I was lucky in the 11th grade I had an excellent American History teacher. And he bluntly stated that most Northerners disliked blacks, he faced more discrimination in the North then he ever did in the South and that the Civil War wasn't about slavery. That abolitionist were in the minority, and the rest of the populace could have cared less about the slavery issue. He actually taught about the New York Draft Riots. As you have probably guessed he was an African American.

He was one of the best teachers I have ever had. In his class we didn't memorize a bunch of boring dates (which I hated) but learned the causes & affects of various actions and we debated EVERYTHING. You had to be prepared to debate both sides of an issue so you really had to dig in and LEARN. It was a wonderful class. I hope to make my class half as interesting.

I think if Lincoln had just let the South go slavery would have gradually ended. With the invention of labor saving devices it would have no longer been needed and a LOT of respected Southerners (Robert E. Lee for one) questioned the morality of slavery. If the slaves had been freed gradually they would have been better prepared for freedom (Tommie Thompson made that point in his book) and we might not have the Welfare mess we do now.

Sherry said...

Wow! You've written the post I've had running around in my head for a while now. Very nicely done.

Sherry

Anonymous said...

Thanks for a wonderful post. As a Southerner from a long-standing Southern family, I always appreciate it when someone has the courage to view the Civil War as the complex issue it was, instead of as the way it is usually portrayed--the good North against the evil South. Thanks for the great comment on my blog! Lee